Treglia online dating

In the present application, applicant was confronted by s.22A(1).Since the revocation of bail, applicant has been committed for trial.Because hair follicles, sweat glands & sebaceous glands have been destroyed, she has problems with temperature control. Guilty plea - 'worst case'category - whether sentencing error - R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 - contrition - subjective features - weight given. BIKIC, Ned - CCA, Giles JA, Sully & Levine JJCitation: R v Bikic [2001] NSWCCA 537Conviction appeal.1 x murder; 1 x manslaughter.

Treglia online dating software defined radio receiver online dating

HOFER, Rudolph - CCA, Wood CJ at CL, Sperling JCitation: R v Hofer [2001] NSWCCA 544Sentence appeal.

Supply methylamphetamine on an ongoing basis; a Form 1 matter (possess cannabis - 62 grams).5y with NPP of 3y.

KILLICK, John Reginald - CCA, 4.1.2002 - 127 A Crim R 273O'Keefe J, Smart AJR v Killick [2002] NSWCCA 1Sentence appeal.

Two indictments containing multiple charges: robbery; discharge firearm; escape; assault pilot; detain for advantage; steal MV.

Self-incrimination - objection taken - already convicted of offence - possible appeal - whether reasonable grounds for objection - application of s.128 Evidence Act 1995.

Held: Objection to answering questions on ground of self-incrimination overruled, subject to objection to particular questions.Desire to undertake treatment for alcohol abuse - when not affected by alcohol, behaviour unexceptional - excellent work record. LU LU - NSW SC, 29.1.2002Citation: R v Lu Lu [2002] NSWSC 14Judgment on application for bail.Knowingly concerned in the importation of commercial quantity amphetamine; knowingly concerned in importation of commercial quantity heroin.Prior sentences - sentencing for serious multiple offences - correct commencement dates for subsequent sentences - sentence must start at expiration of NPP of prior sentences - allowance for early guilty plea - law reform - need for amendment of sentencing legislation to ensure total of head sentences not reduced, by reason of accumulation provisions to an unacceptable level. High category of blameworthiness - not worst case category - infatuation - break-up of illicit liaison by victim - anger, resentment, vengeance and deprivation as motivating factors - absence of remorse and contrition - general deterrence - special circumstances - age of prisoner - progressive medical condition of prisoner. KINCHELA, Shane Anthony - NSW SC, Sperling J, 23.1.2002Citation: R v Kinchela [2002] NSWSC 8Judgment on application for bail for purpose of obtaining treatment for alcohol dependency.Appeal allowed: errors corrected, sentences restructured. KHALOUF, Ali - NSW SC, O'Keefe J, 29.1.2002Citation: R v Khalouf [2002] NSWSC 19Remarks on Sentence. Applicant on remand, facing committal proceedings following threatening 3 youths with a firearm as well as a large number of people at a hotel.Evidence was received from one witness, whereupon the Crown commenced cross examination of that witness.

Tags: , ,